It is currently May 23rd, 2013, 2:48 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: September 2nd, 2009, 9:09 am 
Offline
I am a person my parents warned me about
User avatar

Joined: October 31st, 2003, 12:29 pm
Posts: 45305
Location: The Ozarks
No. Of Shows Attended: 11
I think these are good proposals

Under new rules proposed by the FAA this week, flight schools would be excused from the requirement to have a ground school space if they offer Internet-based ground-school training, and students would be allowed to apply for both a private pilot certificate and an instrument rating at the same time.

The agency also said it would like to change its definition of "complex airplane" to include airplanes equipped with FADEC engines. Another change would require pilots of single-pilot-certified light jets to pass a proficiency check. The FAA also said it would like to make it easier to issue U.S. certificates to foreign pilots. "Because of changing technology in aviation, the results of successful research, and an international agreement, the FAA has determined these proposed changes to the pilot, flight instructor, and pilot school certification rules are necessary," the FAA said in its proposal. The changes will help to reduce unnecessary regulatory burdens, the FAA said.

The proposal also would change the requirements for commercial pilot applicants, both single-engine and multiengine, to replace the current 10 hours of complex airplane aeronautical experience with 10 hours of advanced instrument training. Fewer single-engine aircraft are being produced with retractable landing gear, the FAA said, but more have technologically advanced cockpits. "Many pilot schools have complained about the necessity to keep 30-year old Cessna 172RGs and Piper Arrows in inventory, which are less technically advanced airplanes, for the sole purpose of providing 10 hours of complex airplane training," the FAA said. Furthermore, the FAA said, most commercial pilot applicants are simultaneously applying for the instrument-airplane rating, so this proposal would reduce training costs and align the rules with current training and certification practices. For more details, click here to go to the full text of the FAA's notice of proposed rulemaking.

_________________
Follow me on Twitter! @joshdmartin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: September 2nd, 2009, 9:12 am 
Offline
Last One Standing
User avatar

Joined: July 7th, 2009, 7:42 pm
Posts: 2129
Location: The zip code I made fun of all my life 78209
No. Of Shows Attended: 0
HMMMM

retract gear is needed what is complex different skill set requirements things change good arguments for the changes as far as retract gear and higher speeds those motor skills must also be practiced.

_________________
http://www.ausaboxing.com/main.html boxing
http://www.ausaboxing.com/Talesindextoda.html novel about crosscountry running
http://www.ausaboxing.com/satspotindex.html flying


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: September 3rd, 2009, 6:55 pm 
Offline
On A Slow Boat To China

Joined: August 24th, 2009, 12:03 pm
Posts: 136
No. Of Shows Attended: 0
Link doesn't work but most of those things make sense. I'm just hoping the new rest and duty limitations are significant improvements over the existing rules.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group